Legal Opinion

Hare v. Hooper

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1898No. 8407Published

Appeal from the district court of Deuel county. Heard below before Neville, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

The plaintiff instituted this action in the district court of Deuel county, to effect the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage, and -from a decree in which was recognized and allowed the force and sufficiency of the plea and *481proof of usury in the contract from which originated the indebtedness, the paym ent of which the mortgage in suit was given to secure, has appealed to this court.

The sole contention is that the evidence was insufficient to support the finding of the usurious nature of the said contract. The only portion of the plea of the appellee which could be determined to be of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Courtnay v. PriceNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Olmsted v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Cheney v. EberhardtNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  4. New England Mortgage Security Co. v. HendricksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Anderson v. ValleryNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API