Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Motley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1976No. 37211Published

1DissentMcMILLIAN, Judge

I dissent from the majority opinion because I believe that statutorily mandated sentences to the extent that they deny the court the right to exercise its discretion to suspend either the imposition or execution of a sentence constitutes an intolerable usurpation of an inherent power of the court to grant probation.

My initial disagreement with the majority opinion was on the issue of jurisdiction. The case should be within the exclusive appellate jurisdiction of the Missouri Supreme Court as one involving the “construction of the Constitution of the United States or of this state,” Mo.Const.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. The People v. McCabeIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. SinclairMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Clark v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API