State v. Thomas Maddex
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.
The State appeals an order which essentially denied restitution to the victim. The State argues, and we agree, that the trial court erred in reaching its conclusion that it had no jurisdiction over the defendant. We therefore reverse.
The State charged the defendant with burglary of an unoccupied conveyance. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the defendant pled no contest, and the trial court withheld adjudication, placed the defendant on probation for eighteen months, ordered restitution, and reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount. The order also provided that “Probation shall…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Koile v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Exposito v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- State v. McMahonSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Gladfelter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Ramos v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Florida v. Walford FolkesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- State v. ConryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. ConryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020