Legal Opinion

Woolman v. Garringer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Thi/rd Bistriot, Lewis and Clarke Cov/nty. This is the same case that was before this court at its August term, 1872, 1 Mon. 535.

1Opinion of the CourtKnowles, J.

The facts presented to ns in this case, as we gather them from the record, are as follows: The cause was tried in the district court of tbe third judicial district, in the county of Lewis and Clarke, in the year 1871. Certain special issues were then submitted to a jury impaneled in this cause. The jury found upon these issues, and brought in a general verdict also for ■ plaintiffs for damages. The objects of the action were to recover damages for the wrongful diversion of water, and for an injunction to restrain the defendants from diverting the same. IJpon the special findings both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hornbuckle v. ToombsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Stearus v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stackpole v. HallahanMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Middle Creek Ditch Co. v. HenryMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Crockett v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Kimpton v. Jubilee Placer Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API