Legal Opinion

(PS) Boudousquie v. US Department of the Army

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 30, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00948Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LOUIS JOSEPH BOUDOUSQUIE, No. 2:23-cv-00948-DAD-SCR 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, et al. 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 17 to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) 18 (ECF No. 16) was submitted without oral argument after full briefing (ECF Nos. 20, 21, & 22). 19 The undersigned now recommends that the Motion be granted.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Elgin v. Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. D.L. ex rel. Junio v. VassilevCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API