Sparks v. Detterline
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*602The defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 852 [1985]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 559 [1980]). The conclusion set forth in the affirmed report of the defendant’s examining physician, Dr. Jeffrey S. Oppenheim, that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Snyder v. AFCO Avports Mgt., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024