Legal Opinion

State v. Lumpkin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 24, 1994No. 91CR0280ST; CA A72934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*603DEITS, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction, on stipulated facts, for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992-(4)(b). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from his person and his vehicle. We affirm.

On the morning of April 24, 1991, Officer Ludwig responded to a report that a person matching defendant’s description was attempting to break into a car parked near an elementary school. Ludwig confronted defendant, who was confused and distracted. His eyes darted from side to side as Ludwig asked him questions about why he had approached…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RickardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API