Legal Opinion

State v. Randolph

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The writ of error coram nobis is a discretionary writ which may be issued by the court which tried the case but only when narrow requirements are met.

“It is well established that in order to constitute a ground for granting of coram nobis an error of fact must be presented that meets the double-barreled requirement of (1) having been unknown at the time of the trial, and (2) having been of such a nature that it would have prevented the judgment had it been known.”

The circuit court ruled that the instant petition alleged no grounds for such writ, and did not examine the truth of any allegation.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Parent v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. TurpinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Fritz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Honore v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Mikulovsky v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. SchillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Jessen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wilbanks v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API