Legal Opinion

In re Samuelsohn

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided December 9, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In the matter of L,esser Samuelsohn and others, as individuals and copartners composing the firm of Samuelsohn Bros. & Co., bankrupts. On petition for review of a referee’s order denying tfie petition of Simon M. Shimberg, a creditor, for an order directing the trustee to file with the referee or clerk the testimony of the bankrupts, or to permit examination thereof.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This is a petition for the review of an order made by the referee in bankruptcy herein, denying the petition of Simon M. Shimberg, a creditor herein;-for an order directing the trustee to file with the referee, or with the clerk of this court, the testimony of the bankrupts, given upon their examination, or to permit said Shimberg to have access to the same.

The question submitted for review is in principle controlled by In re Saur (D. C.) 10 Am. Bankr. Rep. 353, 122 Fed. 101. In that case, it is true, thq claim had been proven and allowed; but such fact is not a material…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re SullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  2. National Bank of Commerce in Denver v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. In re JehuDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1899
  4. In re SaurDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903
  5. In re PriceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re SymingtonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  2. In Re Winton Shirt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. Baltimore Sun Co. v. Astri Investment Management & Securities Corp. (In Re Astri Investment, Management & Securities Corp.)District Court, D. Maryland · 1988
  4. In re BarragerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1911
  5. In re WilkinDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API