Legal Opinion

Gezu v. Charter Communications

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided January 7, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01476Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION FISSEHA GEZU, § Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 3:20-cv-01476-G-BT § CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the Court in this pro se employment discrimination suit is Plaintiff Fisseha Gezu’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions against Counsel for Defendant (ECF No. 16) and Second Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 23). For the reasons stated, the Motions are DENIED. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 authorizes a court to impose sanctions on a party or an attorney who files a pleading for an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. CyrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. Elliott v. TiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Tompkins v. CyrDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API