Legal Opinion

Day v. Eckel

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1968Published

1Opinion of the CourtMichael Catalano, J.

Third-party defendants, Ibhotson-Bitchie, Inc. (“Ibbotson”) and Ford Motor Company (“ Ford ”), separately move for an order, pursuant to CPLB 3211, dismissing the third-party complaint for insufficiency.

Plaintiffs’ major complaint states that on August 7, 1967, at 2:00 p.m. defendant owned and operated a Ford motor vehicle, which left the highway, went through a plate glass window at 332 Kenmore Avenue, Buffalo, New York, striking infant plaintiff, Michael Day (“ Michael ”); and in paragraph 6: “ That the aforementioned collision and the resulting injuries and damages to the infant plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rooney v. S. A. Healy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Brown v. Hersch Chemists, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Brown v. Hersch Chemists, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Cohen v. WassermanNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API