Legal Opinion

Tarantino v. Portale

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 2008No. 89376PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mary Eileen Kilbane, Judge.

{¶ 1} On March 22, 2000, plaintiff-appellee Terrence Tarantino, d.b.a. La Dolce Vita (“Tarantino”), filed a complaint, a motion for a temporary restraining order, and a motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants-appellants, Joseph Pórtale (“Pórtale”), Michael Mann (“Michael”), Thomas Mann (“Thomas”), and later, new party defendant Flynn Properties, L.L.C. (“Flynn”). Tarantino amended his complaint .to allege breach of lease, breach of oral contract, unjust enrichment or detrimental reliance, assault, battery, false imprisonment, tortious interference,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Celebrezze v. GibbsOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Poindexter v. GranthamOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Westbrook v. Swiatek, 07 Cae 09 0046 (12-10-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API