Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Dameron

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 13, 1939No. 2134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE, Justice.

This suit "was instituted by E. M. Da-meron to recover the value of an oat crop grown on 25 acres of land alleged to have been converted on or about June 12, 1936, by John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company. The case was tried before the judge and a jury and judgment was rendered on the jury’s verdict in favor of E. M. Dameron for the alleged value of the oat crop. Appellant says that the evidence shows as a matter of law that it did not convert to its use any oats belonging to appellee.

A. L. Mills and wife, Sallie Nora Mills, conveyed 49 acres of land out of the George H.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. HebertTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Carter v. BacleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Pinchback v. SwaseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hayward v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Garza v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Gilliland Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API