Legal Opinion

James Gordon Primus v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 7, 2020No. 20640-17SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

T.C. Summary Opinion 2020-2

UNITED STATES TAX COURT JAMES GORDON PRIMUS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20640-17S. Filed January 7, 2020. James Gordon Primus, pro se. Bryon M. Huang and Gennady Zilberman, for respondent. SUMMARY OPINION COLVIN, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 74631 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed. 1 Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times. We round all monetary amounts to the nearest dollar. Petitioner resided in (continued...)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Richmond Television Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  2. Richmond Television Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Jackson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  4. John Jackson, Yvonne Jackson, Gregory M. Barrow and Timsey Barrow, Cross-Appellees v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Blitzer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API