Biggs v. Moll
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY I. EAGER, Special Commissioner.
The plaintiffs here seek specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. The trial court decreed specific performance. Defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled by lapse of time and she appealed in due course. We have jurisdiction because title to real estate is involved. Arnold v. Smith et al., Mo., 436 S.W.2d 719, Cossairt v. Reich, Mo., 370 S. W.2d 291. Since the case is here for our original review on the facts, they will need to be stated in some detail.
Defendant, a widow, owned a tract of land in Jefferson County; her counsel…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ray v. WoosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Ragan v. SchrefflerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Wilkinson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Drake v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Smith v. PiperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Three-O-Three Investments, Inc. v. MoffittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- McBee v. Gustaaf Vandecnocke Revocable TrustSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Dunning v. Alfred H. Mayer CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Peet v. RandolphMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- DeWitt v. LutesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.