Legal Opinion
Valentine v. Perlman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 30, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The intermediate order brought up for review is wholly unauthorized. It has resulted in a judgment of fifty dollars for the plaintiff, from which he appeals. The practice resorted to was due to a misconception of the meaning and effect of certain provisions of the Civil Practice Act.
This action was brought to recover, pursuant to an alleged special contract, $250,000 or five per cent of the amount realized on certain patents, for procuring one Rosenberg to furnish funds to prosecute patent litigation. The answer set up that under section 380 of the General Business Law, known as chapter 25 of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Koppel Industrial Car & Equipment Co. v. Portalis & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Hollingsworth v. Spectator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Bush v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- American Union Line, Inc. v. Oriental Navigation Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- American Union Line, Inc. v. Oriental Navigation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lowe v. LoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Water Right & Electrical Co. v. Rockland Light & Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Cooperstown Cattle Co. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949