Legal Opinion
Hill v. Marston
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 15, 1994No. 93-6133Published
1Opinion of the Court
13 F.3d 1548
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,070
David HILL; Mailon Kent, Jr.; Ronald C. McCoy; Peggy S.
McCoy; James A. Sparacio; Glenda S. Sparacio;
George M. Hill; Hardin & Hollis Profit
Sharing Plan, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
C. Henry MARSTON, who is sued individually and as a partner
in the law firm of Cabiness, Johnston, Gardner,
Dumas & O'Neal, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-6133.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 15, 1994.
James L. Shores, Jr., Birmingham, AL, for plaintiffs-appellants.
W. Michael Atchison, Birmingham, AL, for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.