Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Corsicana Nat. Bank

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1922No. 318-3654Published

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, P. J.

Defendant in error, Cor-sicana National Bank, sued J. A. and A. B. Lancaster and M. A. Cox to recover the amount of two promissory notes; one for the sum of $73.25, signed by J. A. and A. B. Lancaster, and the other for the sum of $61.-50, signed by J. A. Lancaster alone.

Defendant in error alleged that both notes were secured by a chattel mortgage upon certain personal property described therein, and also secured by the transfer to it of three certain vendor’s Hen notes of the aggregate amount of $1,200, executed by M. A. Cox, payable to the order of J. A. Lancaster. Defendant in error…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wallace & Co. v. FinbergTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  2. McKee v. SimsTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Stiff v. FisherTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Gilmour v. HeinzeTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Lancaster v. Corsicana Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API