Legal Opinion

Garfinkl v. Garfinkl

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 30, 1976No. Nos. 74-1711, 74-1749PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

There has recently appeared in the opinions of the District Courts of Appeal of Florida the concept that a dissolution of a marriage may be entered upon a determination that the marriage is irretrievably broken with the trial court by subsequent judgment proceeding to settle the financial problems of the dissolution. See Klarish v. Klarish, Fla.App.1974, 296 So.2d 497; Becker v. King, Fla.App. 1975, 307 So.2d 855, 860; Hyman v. Hyman, Fla.App. 1975, 310 So.2d 378; In re Marriage of Golub, Fla.App.1975, 310 So.2d 380. This appeal is concerned with such an order.

The difficulties…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Becker v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Hyman v. HymanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Mayflower Investment Co. v. BrillSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Klarish v. KlarishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Galbut v. GarfinklSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Garfinkl v. GarfinklDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API