Legal Opinion
United States v. Denard Darnell Neal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 5, 1992No. 91-10078PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this case is whether multiple convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) arising from the same indictment require the statute’s enhanced penalties for repeat offenders. We find that the statute by its plain language requires the enhanced penalties.
I
A grand jury indicted Denard Darnell Neal on three counts of bank robbery and three counts of using a firearm in a crime *602of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The indictment charged that Neal robbed a bank in Phoenix, Arizona, on November 10, 1989, a second bank in Tucson, Arizona, on November 29, 1989, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Emmett Lovell NaborsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. FooteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. RaynorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Charles A. RawlingsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Donald Bennett and Steven R. KeithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. AtchesonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 753, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1177 United States of America v. Paula Andrews, United States of America v. Ivan AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Keith Wayne Quinn, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.