Legal Opinion

United States v. Miller

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 6, 1908No. 90PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. The facts, which involve the construction of §§ 1098 and 1261 of the Revised Statutes, and the opening clause of the Navy Personnel Act. of March 13, 1899, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

. Me.. Justice Day

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is an action in the Court of Claims brought by William G. Miller, a lieutenant in the Navy, and who served as flag lieutenant on the personal staff of Rear Admiral Kautz from July 1, 1899, to March 2, 1900, for which period he claims that he is entitled to recover pay at the additional rate of $200 a year, as an aid to the rear admiral, and, secondly, an additional sum for longevity increase, baséd upon this additional allowance. The facts were found by the Court of Claims and judgment rendered in favor of the claimant upon both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. United States v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. United States v. CrosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1905

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. State v. Huber CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Plummer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1921
  5. Eastern Cherokees v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API