Legal Opinion
Shree Rama Enterprises v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 7, 1997No. Court No. 97-07-01099PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
DiCarlo, Senior Judge:
Plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction to prevent the collection of countervailing duty deposits at the new company-specific rates published in Certain Iron-Metal Castings from India, 62 Fed. Reg. 32,297 (Dep’t Commerce 1997) (final admin, review) [hereinafter Final Determination]. Plaintiffs are asking the court to preserve the former country-wide rate of 5.13% pendingjudicial review of the Final Determination. Because plaintiffs have not demonstrated that they will be irreparably harmed by the new deposit rates, their motion is denied.
Backg…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- S. J. Stile Associates Ltd. v. SnyderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Queen's Flowers de Colombia v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Shakeproof Industrial Products Division of Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. The United States and Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Decca Hospitality Furnishings, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Elkem Metals Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Ninestar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
- Shandong Huarong General Group Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Otter Products, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.