Burns v. Burns
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
847 S.W.2d 23 (1993)
312 Ark. 61
Harold J. BURNS, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Janet L. BURNS, Appellee.
No. 92-863.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
February 15, 1993.
David L. Rush, Paris, for appellant.
Jeanne Anne Whitmire, Fort Smith, for appellee.
DUDLEY, Justice.
The primary issue in this divorce case is whether we continue to hold, as we did in Durham v. Durham, 289 Ark. 3, 708 S.W.2d 618 (1986), that the language of our marital property statute does not include nonvested military retirement benefits. We again construe the statute in the same way. The chancellor did not follow the Durham case, and, on that…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Day v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Williford v. WillifordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.