Legal Opinion

Burns v. Burns

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 15, 1993No. 92-863Published

1Opinion of the Court

847 S.W.2d 23 (1993)

312 Ark. 61

Harold J. BURNS, Jr., Appellant,

v.

Janet L. BURNS, Appellee.

No. 92-863.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

February 15, 1993.

David L. Rush, Paris, for appellant.

Jeanne Anne Whitmire, Fort Smith, for appellee.

DUDLEY, Justice.

The primary issue in this divorce case is whether we continue to hold, as we did in Durham v. Durham, 289 Ark. 3, 708 S.W.2d 618 (1986), that the language of our marital property statute does not include nonvested military retirement benefits. We again construe the statute in the same way. The chancellor did not follow the Durham case, and, on that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Day v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  5. Williford v. WillifordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API