Legal Opinion

In re Bean

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided February 22, 1900No. 221PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELEB, District Judge.

The bankrupt’s pension money, in his hands at the time of filing his petition as it was received, and not loaned or invested, or changed in its nature, would seem to be exempt, under section 4747, Rev. St. IT. S., which not only exempts it in transmission, but provides that “it shall inure wholly to the benefit of such pensione^.” This excludes all others while it re*263mains pension money in tlie pensioner's hands. In Martin v. Hurlburt, 60 Vt. 364, 14 Atl. 649, the pension money had been changed in nature by investment into a savings bank deposit; not for safekeeping,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. HurlburtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Athen Carlton Garland, BankruptsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  2. Gretsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
  3. In re RoarkDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1930
  4. In re HinesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1902
  5. In re JonesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API