Legal Opinion

In re Mastine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court on February 20, 1974, and maintains an office in Syracuse. The *300Grievance Committee’s petition charges him with commingling and conversion of client funds and with failing to maintain a special trust account. Respondent in his answer admits the charges and sets forth mitigating circumstances.

The petition alleges, and respondent admits that the Grievance Committee was notified by the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1300.1 (g), that respondent’s check, issued against the trust account of respondent…

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re RothschildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re JasenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. In re BergevinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API