In re Mastine
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court on February 20, 1974, and maintains an office in Syracuse. The *300Grievance Committee’s petition charges him with commingling and conversion of client funds and with failing to maintain a special trust account. Respondent in his answer admits the charges and sets forth mitigating circumstances.
The petition alleges, and respondent admits that the Grievance Committee was notified by the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1300.1 (g), that respondent’s check, issued against the trust account of respondent…
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re RothschildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re JasenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re BergevinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996