Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Dilbeck

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1937No. L. A. 15589PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an appeal by defendant, W. D. Dilbeck, from a judgment against him in the sum of $13,275.77, found by the trial court to be the balance due from him to plaintiff upon a certain agreement between them. Plaintiff, T. W. Mitchell, the secretary-treasurer of the Home Benefit Association, a local mutual aid association operating under the laws of the state of Texas, with headquarters at Hillsboro, Texas, on November 28,1932, entered into the following agreement with the defendant:

" State of Texas, County of Hill.
“T. W. Mitchell, first party, and W. D. Dilbeck, second party, make the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Forbes v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rowen v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. Cohen v. Kite Hill Community Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Goode v. PowersArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Crespinel v. Color Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Griffin v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API