Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Wenkhous

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 4, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Belehanty, S.

Beceased sustained fatal injuries while employed as a seaman. Under the United States statute (commonly referred to as the Jones Act [U. S. Code, tit. 46, § 688]) his dependents may recover for loss due to his death. Some years ago deceased entered into an alliance with a woman already married and as a result a child was born to the couple. Following the death of deceased, *664the mother of this child applied in Kings county for letters of administration upon the estate of deceased, and in her petition asserted that she was the widow of deceased. Letters were issued to her, and in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of WinkhousNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Doyle v. Albatross Tanker Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  3. In re the Estate of DankerlNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
  4. In re the Estate of DankerlNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
  5. In re the Estate of FooteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API