Legal Opinion

Ruben Velez v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1968No. 25014_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The issues presented by this appeal from a narcotics conviction have been resolved by prior Fifth Circuit decisions. At the trial, an informer testified as to transactions between appellant and himself and w’as corroborated by a policeman, who, with the informer’s permission, overheard one transaction by means of an electronic transmitting device concealed on the informer’s person and another by means of an extension phone. The argument that the use of an electronic transmitter or extension phone in this manner is forbidden by Katz v. United States, 1967, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Donald Croom Beatty, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Johnny Dancy, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. William Fred Dryden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. A. Z. Handsford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. David BuenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. ColeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Michael Henley and Annette Henley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Angel Prieto-OlivasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. Lennard Coley and Paul Dabney Scogin, No. 30139 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API