Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Johnson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1978No. 41755Published

1DissentWhite, C. J.

Besides joining in the dissent of Spencer, J., I wish to add the following:

I

Subsection (3) of section 29-1207, R. R. S. 1943, provides: “(3) If such defendant is to be tried again following a mistrial, an order for a new trial, or an appeal or collateral attack, such period shall commence to run from the date of the mistrial, order granting a new trial, or the mandate on remand.” (Emphasis supplied.)

The statute requires the defendant be brought to trial (not a completed trial) within 6 months (not counting excludable time). He was “brought to *335trial” on February 16, 1977. He failed to appear…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maher v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Svehla v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. FromkinNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. StevensNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Critser v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API