Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Muller
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 9, 1912No. Gen. No. 18,313PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Rufus F. Robinson, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1912.
1Per curiam
June 24, 1912, we reserved until the hearing a motion made by the defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error in this cause because sued out more than thirty days after the judgment. We have now taken the cause into consideration and determined that we must grant the motion, for the reasons set forth in the opinion in Novelty Tufting Machinery Company v. The Peters & Roberts Furniture Company, 170 Ill. App. 134. The writ of error is therefore dismissed.
Writ of error dismissed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Novelty Tufting Machine Co. v. Peters & Roberts Furniture Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Grey v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913