Legal Opinion

Lauermann v. Danbury Board of Ed., No. Cv98 033 08 43 S (Jul. 22, 1998)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 22, 1998No. CV98 033 08 43 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE

The court grants defendant Danbury Board of Education's motion to strike the third, sixth and seventh counts of the complaint on the grounds that plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Specifically, the court finds that § 10-235 of the Connecticut General Statutes does not provide an injured plaintiff with a direct cause of action.

The court recognizes that there is a split of authority regarding this issue. This court is persuaded,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ambrose v. Singe, No. 320896 (Jun. 10, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API