Legal Opinion

Eastham v. Public Employees' Retirement Ass'n Board

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1976No. 10322PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTOYA, Justice.

Plaintiffs, claiming membership in the Public Employees’ Retirement Association under the Legislative Retirement Act [§ 5-5-6.1, N.M.S.A., 1953 (Repl.Vol. 2, pt. 1, 1974)], brought an action seeking a judgment in the District 'Court of Santa Fe County to declare the Legislative Retirement Act unconstitutional. They also sought an injunction forbidding retirement payments to annuitant legislators if the Legislative Retirement Act was declared unconstitutional. Named as defendants in the action were members of the Public Employees’ Retirement Association Board (PERA),…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eastham v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT ASS'N BD.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API