Legal Opinion

Oregonian Ry. Co. v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.

United States Circuit Court

Decided March 18, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action on Covenant in Lease to Recover Rent.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff, a corporation alleged to have been formed in Great Britain under the “Companies Act of 1862,” against the defendant, a corporation formed under the Oregon corporation act of 1862, to recover'the sum of $68,131, alleged to be due the plaintiff on a lease of its railway, in Oregon, commonly called the “Narrow Gauge” road, for the half year commencing May 15,1884. The case was before this court in December last, on a motion to strike out the second amended answer of the defendant as “frivolous and immaterial,” and for judgment on the complaint, which was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts v. Town of PawletSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. Emigrant Co. v. County of AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. In re ComstockDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1874
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. CronkhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lukens v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. New v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Industrial Commission v. Arizona Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Elgin Nat. Watch Co. v. LovelandU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1904
  5. City of Spokane v. CostelloWashington Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API