John A. Maher and Madeline K. Maher v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Circuit Judge:
Taxpayers claimed a casualty loss deduction on their 1974 federal income tax return for the death of 22 coconut palm trees due to a disease known as “lethal yellowing.” The Tax Court disallowed the claim and assessed a deficiency. Contrary to taxpayers’ argument that the destruction of their trees was a deductible casualty loss under Section 165(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, we affirm.
Background
Taxpayers John and Madeline Maher, husband and wife, purchased a home in Miami Beach, Florida in May 1974. On the property were 22 fully matured coconut palm trees.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fay v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Matheson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Rosenberg v. Commisssioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- John Alan Appleman and Jean G. Appleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Leslie v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Robert F. Goeller and Jeanette M. Goeller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Ambrose v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Hovhannissian v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.