Legal Opinion

John A. Maher and Madeline K. Maher v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 6, 1982No. 81-5561PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Circuit Judge:

Taxpayers claimed a casualty loss deduction on their 1974 federal income tax return for the death of 22 coconut palm trees due to a disease known as “lethal yellowing.” The Tax Court disallowed the claim and assessed a deficiency. Contrary to taxpayers’ argument that the destruction of their trees was a deductible casualty loss under Section 165(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, we affirm.

Background

Taxpayers John and Madeline Maher, husband and wife, purchased a home in Miami Beach, Florida in May 1974. On the property were 22 fully matured coconut palm trees.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fay v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Matheson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  4. Rosenberg v. Commisssioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  5. John Alan Appleman and Jean G. Appleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Leslie v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  3. Robert F. Goeller and Jeanette M. Goeller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Ambrose v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Hovhannissian v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API