Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Thompson

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided January 15, 1863PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment. This action was brought by Edward Rowe against Elmor Thompson. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

The plaintiff held notes of the defendant, dated respectively, March 8th, 1852, April 1st, 1852, and May 5th, 1852, and each payable six months after date. About the first of February, 1856, the defendant requested Mr. Hodges to “ get his creditors to do something so that they could not molest him for a couple of years, to enable him to go into business.” Mr. Hodges, acting upon this request, called upon the plaintiff to see if “ he would not molest the defendant for two years, so that he could go into business: the plaintiff agreed to it.” Mr. Hodges also said on the trial, “ I merely asked…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. ShieldsNew York Supreme Court · 1841
  2. Utica Insurance v. BloodgoodNew York Supreme Court · 1830

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hobart v. VerraultAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. In re the Final Settlement of the Accounts of SanfordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
  4. Fordice v. ScribnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API