Legal Opinion

In Re Silk

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 8, 1932No. 206PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

55 F.2d 917 (1932)

In re SILK.

CLOUTMAN

v.

WEILL et al.

No. 206.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 8, 1932.

Paul E. Lockwood, of New York City (Boyd MacLean, of New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Cohen, Gutman & Richter, of New York City (Abraham L. Gutman and Wm. Victor Goldberg, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

Upon his voluntary petition William Silk was adjudicated a bankrupt on July 10, 1929. His schedules showed no assets. Debts of some $12,000 were listed, including that to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1911
  2. First Nat. Bank v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  3. In re LaneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
  4. In re John Osborn's Sons & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  5. In re PaineDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Honda v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hammer v. TuffyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. In Re Hotel St. James Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  4. In re Gibraltor-Amusements Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. In Re Supernit, Inc. Appeal of BoydCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API