Legal Opinion

Begay v. Sawtelle

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1939No. Civil No. 4026PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Cecil Begay, hereinafter called petitioner, applied to this court for an original writ of mandamus against W. H. Sawtelle, as state game warden of the state of Arizona, hereinafter called respondent, asMng that the latter be ordered to issue to him a resident general hunting and fishing license, under the provisions of chapter 44, Session Laws of 1935.

Petitioner alleged as grounds of action that he was a citizen of the United States and of the state of Arizona, and of the Indian race, being a member of the Navajo tribe, and a ward of the government of the United States, under the charge of an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Webster v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Harper v. GallowaySupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  3. Porter v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Bem-Way-Bin-Ness v. EshelbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Bird v. WinyerWashington Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Harrison v. LaveenArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Frazier v. TerrillArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Acosta v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Wallace v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API