Legal Opinion

Bodley v. Saul

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00267Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNIE BODLEY, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20-CV-267 Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) (ARBUCKLE, M.J.) ANDREW SAUL, ) Defendant ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Pennie L. Bodley, an adult individual who resides within the Middle District of Pennsylvania, seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Jurisdiction is conferred on this Court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1383(c)(3)(incorporating…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API