Money Station, Inc. v. Electronic Payment Services, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Winkler, Judge.
This appeal arises out of a bench trial in a declaratory judgment action, wherein the trial judge found that the terms of an agreement between the parties was ambiguous and required extrinsic evidence to interpret the contractual provision at issue. Before this court can examine the assignments of error raised by plaintiff-appellant, Money Station, Inc., a detailed history of the case is necessary.
An automatic teller machine (“ATM”) is a machine utilized by banks to allow customers with ATM cards to withdraw cash and to make balance inquiries, deposits, payment authorizations,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Kelly v. Medical Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crane Hollow, Inc. v. Marathon Ashland Pipe Line, LLCOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Savoy Hospitality, L.L.C. v. 5839 Monore St. Assocs., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Anderson Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Anderson Twp. Professional Firefighters Assn., Laff Local 3111Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Charleston Marine Containers Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
- 4656 Company, LLC v. O’Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.