Legal Opinion

Accident Ins. Department of Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 4, 1926No. 6 Div. 491PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit is on a contract or certificate of insurance in the accident insurance department of the Order of Railway Conductors of America, and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff.

The overruling of demurrer to counts 2 and 3 of the complaint, setting out the substance and legal effect of the contract of insurance declared upon, was without error. These pleadings proceeded upon the theory that the application for insurance, insurance certificate, and the laws of the order that were applicable to insurance constituted the contract of insurance, and alleged that the insurance was in full force…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Cherokee Life Ins, Co. v. BrannumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Empire Life Insurance v. GeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Woodmen of the World v. AlfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. RigginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. BridgeforthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Louisiana State Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Mutual Savings Life Ins. Co. v. OsborneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Franco v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  5. American Surety Co. v. HookerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API