Legal Opinion

Westrope & Associates v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2001No. WD 58780PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.

Westrope & Associates filed a petition asking this court to review the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) which concluded that Westrope was liable for a penalty assessed by the Director of Revenue for the delinquent payment of a surplus lines tax. Westrope asserts that the AHC erred because § 384.054, RSMo 2000,1 authorizing the penalty for late payment of a surplus lines tax, makes the imposition of the penalty discretionary, and not mandatory as the Director of Revenue concluded. Alternatively, Westrope asserts that § 384.054 is ambiguous…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Westfall v. MasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. American Healthcare Management, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  4. Brambles Industries, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  5. Van Cleave Printing Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Benn v. Cole (In Re Benn)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. City of Kansas City, Missouri v. Kevin GarnettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Polzin v. Bank of HoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Benn v. Cole (In Re Benn)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. Charles Benn, Jr. v. James S. ColeUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API