Legal Opinion

People v. McDonald

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 1993No. Docket 156546PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a district court jury trial, defendant was convicted of operating a vehicle while having an unlawful blood alcohol level (ouil/ubal), MCL 257.625; MSA 9.2325. During defendant’s trial, the prosecutor was allowed, over defense objection, to ask the arresting officer whether defendant submitted to a chemical breath analysis. The question was allowed and a cautionary instruction was given pursuant to MCL 257.625a(7); MSA 9.2325(1)(7) [now MCL 257.625a(10); MSA 9.2325(1)(10)]. That statute provides in relevant part:

A person’s refusal to submit to a chemical test . . . shall be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caterpillar, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. TrinityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. HayesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. StrattonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Mumaw v. MumawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Teter v. Old Colony Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. BinderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Yakowich v. Department of Consumer & Industry ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People of Michigan v. David Mark ParrottMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. People of Michigan v. David Mark ParrottMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API