People v. McDonald
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Following a district court jury trial, defendant was convicted of operating a vehicle while having an unlawful blood alcohol level (ouil/ubal), MCL 257.625; MSA 9.2325. During defendant’s trial, the prosecutor was allowed, over defense objection, to ask the arresting officer whether defendant submitted to a chemical breath analysis. The question was allowed and a cautionary instruction was given pursuant to MCL 257.625a(7); MSA 9.2325(1)(7) [now MCL 257.625a(10); MSA 9.2325(1)(10)]. That statute provides in relevant part:
A person’s refusal to submit to a chemical test . . . shall be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Caterpillar, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. TrinityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. HayesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. StrattonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Mumaw v. MumawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- Teter v. Old Colony Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. BinderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Yakowich v. Department of Consumer & Industry ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- People of Michigan v. David Mark ParrottMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- People of Michigan v. David Mark ParrottMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.