Legal Opinion

United States v. Larry Brown and Dwite Gene Rover

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 31, 1975No. 75-2193PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We have considered appellants’ assignments of error relating to the insufficiency of the evidence, the jury instructions on bias and on knowledge that the victims were federal officers, the scope of cross-examination, and the sentences as abuses of discretion and as cruel and unusual punishment. After careful review of the record and applicable law, we find these assignments of error to be without merit.

Appellants also urge that the sentencing judge committed reversible error in failing to make an explicit finding at the time of sentencing, as required by Dorszynski v. U. S., 418 U.S. 424, 94…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward Rodriguez, A/K/A Rick, Thomas J. Albernaz, Peter Smigowski, and William John MartinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Larry Joseph Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Sherod William Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Fernando Perez Bustillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Richard Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API