Legal Opinion

Strunski v. Geiger

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1906Published

Appeal by the plain-tiff from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York flismissing the complaint, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

The complaint alleges that, at their special instance and request, plaintiff performed work, labor and services for the defendants of"the reasonable value of $560. The answer is a general denial. The work, labor and services shown upon the trial consisted of the procuring of a purchaser ready, able and willing to buy the defendants’ real estate on terms desired by and satisfactory to them. At the close of plaintiff’s case the learned court 'below dismissed the complaint upon the ground that the written authorization required to be procured by section 640d of the Penal Code by *135persons offering…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cox v. HawkeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API