People v. Lindsey
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted by a jury of arson. After sentence, he appeals by right.
On appeal, defendant raises five issues, only one of which has any merit.
Although defendant frames the issue somewhat differently, the real question is: Was there sufficient evidence upon which the jury could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?
Mere opportunity of a defendant to commit arson is insufficient to support a conviction of arson. To obtain a conviction under the statute, it is necessary to show that a dwelling house was burned by, or at the urging of, or with the assistance of, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. SmockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gardner v. KaptureDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Granderson v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- People of Michigan v. Clifford Anthony SchoeningMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- People of Michigan v. Dan Mathes IVMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- United States v. Jane Doe (r.s.w.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.