Kennedy v. Goodman
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Savage, J. cited: 1 Parsons Contracts, 437. Kansas Mnfg. Go. v. Gandy, 11 Neb., 450. Jarvis v. Sutton, 3 Neb., 289. Haynes v. Thorn, 28 New Hamp., 386. Sullivan v. Collins, 18 Iowa, 228. Kidder v. Blake, 45 New Hamp., 530. Cabot v. Hankins, 3 Pick., 83.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
Goodman brought an action against Kennedy in the district court of Douglas county, upon three promissory notes amounting to $2,715.38 and an account for $715.13. The answer is in substance a want of consideration for the notes as follows: It is alleged in substance that Kennedy was manufacturing “Hemlock Eemedies” and furnishing the same to Goodman, who furnished the ingredients and charged the same to Kennedy. That there was an open running book account between the plaintiff and defendant, and that the notes were given to cover balances as the same appeared from this book account which was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chappedelaine v. DechenauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
- Livingston v. HastieNew York Supreme Court · 1804
- Kansas Manufacturing Co. v. GandyNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by8 opinions
- People's State Bank v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
- Clarke v. KelseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- People's National Bank of Rock Island v. GeisthardtNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Baldrige v. FlothowNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Keller v. KellerNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.