In re Estate of Pulling
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Appeal by a widow from an order of tbe circuit court reversing an order of the probate court which allowed her dower in certain lands sold by her husband on contract, and not folly paid for during his life-time. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
McGrath, J.. The circuit judge found that Henry P.. Pulling and Jeane W. Pulling were married April 26, 1890; that said Henry P. Pulling died July 15, 1890, leaving appellant, his widow, surviving him; that at the time of his death said Henry P. Pulling was seised in fee of ten parcels of land; that, prior to the marriage of Henry P. Pulling, he had made and executed nine separate contracts for the sale of said parcels of land; that at the time of said marriage, and also at the time of his death, the vendees under said contracts were, respectively, in the possession of the several tracts of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gaines v. Gaines'Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
- Brown v. BronsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Oldham v. SaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1840
- Beckwith v. BeckwithMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Adkins v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Detroit Trust Co. v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- In re Stanton's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Detroit Trust Co. v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Rohn v. LeachDefiance County Court of Common Pleas · 1922