Legal Opinion

Brownfield State Bank v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 21, 1934No. 4230PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief .Justice.

The appellant bank sued appellee, Hudson, to recover upon a promissory note in the sum of- $1,081.64, due and payable November 1, 1928, with interest from maturity at the rate of 10 per cent., and which contained a provision for 10 per. cent, attorney’s fees. The appellant also declared upon a chattel mortgage given to. secure said note, and prayed for foreclosure of its mortgage lien.

The defendant, Hudson, answered by general demurrer, a special exception, a general denial, and for special answer alleged in substance that in March, 1920, the promoters of the Stock…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Washer v. SmyerTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. City of New Braunfels v. WaldschmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  4. San Antonio Light Publishing Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. General Bonding & Casualty Insurance v. MoseleyTexas Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graves, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. Texas Tool Traders v. W. E. Grace Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Area, Inc. v. StetenfeldAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API