Legal Opinion

McClurg v. Carte, Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1970No. 270S38PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.

This is an appeal from an action to vacate streets and public grounds in the City of Richmond, Indiana. The petitioners are all the abutting property owners on the streets and public grounds proposed to be vacated and are all those persons particularly interested therein. The appellants are the remonstrators, who are owners of other property in the addition. The trial court, after hearing the remonstrators, entered judgment vacating said streets and public grounds involved.

Appellants, the remonstrators below, contend that none of the petitioners testified that the petitioners “desired” to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. HensleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Rainey v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Public Law No. 305 and Public Law No. 309Indiana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Carpenter v. Whitley County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Viccaro v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Schenkel v. Allen County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Melton v. AREA PLAN COM'N OF EVANSVILLE & v. CTY.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API