Legal Opinion

Harrison v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1921No. 12185, 12186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Dublin — Judge Sturgis. January 8, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

This ease comes to this court upon two separate bills of exceptions, the first assigning error upon the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial, and the second assigning error upon the judgment overruling the motion to set aside the verdict and judgment. While the bills of exceptions, complain of different judgments, both writs of error grow out of the same accusation and the same conviction, and will therefore be dealt with together.

1. The evidence was amply sufficient to authorize the verdict finding the defendant guilty.

*6462. In the absence, of a timely written request for more specific…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Womble v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Rucker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Moses v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Foss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ratliff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Dye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API